 |


Tara Krause
Bio [2004]
In December 2002, Tara Krause had her Dian Fossey moment in
encountering a totalistic NKS rule 1599. And as with/in
Dante--Incipit vita nuova.
Since then, through the opportunity of a fellowship, she has been
exploring that resonance/discovery in her art practice with a short
film, Cellular Automata, Undulating Jellies & Pulsing
Bonitas; three solarplate etchings of rules 110, 52 and a mobile automaton
(NKS 2003); a virtual installation, Mojave
Perturbations: NKS Qualia Emergent (October 2003); an
NKS Translucida series of paintings of acrylic on
aluminum plates (NKS 2004); and a spectrum of monotype experiments in
reactive printmaking. The idea of creating complex art from simple
rules intrigues, energizes, and haunts her.
She is a visual artist and filmmaker, and studied at the Arts Students
League in NYC and in the ateliers of Elizabeth J. Rockey, Bill
Weltman, Harry Hamlin, and Roger Mendes. She is represented by Daniel
Young & Co. in the UK. Her work is in both private and corporate
collections. She holds a B.S. (Engineering/Arabic) from West Point
and an M.B.A. (Management--Executive Program) from New York University.
She is a veteran of the nuclear Cold War and the first Gulf War.
Project Title Greeting the Muse: A Voyage of Exploring the
Behavior, Motif Structures, & Potentialities of Rule 1599 (1 Dimension,
3-Color Totalistic)
Project
The scope of this project involved a series of experiments in both
pure NKS and visual art focusing on the behavior and structures of NKS
rule 1599, a totalistic 3-color, 1D cellular automaton (CA). An
automated search utilized Mathematica to search for four basic
behaviors of rule 1599 under 18,439 specified initial conditions at
300 steps.
The behavior categories were: those that died within the first initial
steps; those that resolved into two different single persistent
structures ("ladybugs" and "tracks"); and those that were potentially
interesting. A visual survey of the 13,832 interesting specified
conditions showed three major readily observable recurring motif
subcomponent structures: multiple persistent structures ("ladybugs+,"
"Indian earrings," and "diadems"). There were also two other
categories of substructures that held out to 5000 steps: infrequent
but interesting ("cold babushka," "grey triangle," "lobster
head"--which looks remarkably like the Chrysler building, and "hooked
fish"); and lesser indeterminants. These lesser indeterminants as
well as the experiments on behavior under random conditions appear to
show intriguing smaller subcomponent pattern elements.
Given these experiments in 1D, there emerged questions regarding the
artistic challenge of exploring these patterns and structures in the
universe story space of 3D. A series of different 3D graphics
demonstrated that there are a multitude of ways of visualizing these
CAs. Strikingly, this presented an aesthetic challenge akin to Picasso
and Dali exploring implications of 4D with Einstein--how do we as
practicing contemporary artists explore and express the computational
universe?
Two art experiments took up this challenge: a series of abstract
explorations in acrylics based upon simple rules, and a short film
experiment of those paintings filmed within the constraints of Dogme
95 simple rules ("Oath of Chastity") to the rhythm and music of
Katarina Miljkovic's Rule 41, Turing Machine and 1599. The
results of the experimental process point to a potential new visual
vocabulary rich for future exploration, as well as an NKS Way of Art
that combines experimentation and a humility of irreducibility, where
the artist becomes part of the simple rule, seeking the essence and
that coalescing moment of self-evidence that cascades new
meanings. Discovery and emergence become part of the artistic process.
In terms of art, the next challenge beckons: how does one experience CAs
synaesthetically?
Favorite two-color, radius-2 rule
Rule chosen: 4410
I found it interesting because of its non-symmetry, and the
directional growth of the persistent structures and periodic
background, which I had not seen before. It appears that the
persistent structures continue out at least toward step 1500. After
40 steps, when we partition the last column into groups of 40,
they are all the same. Interestingly enough this was not visually
apparent. We had to conduct analysis to find its periodicity.
|
 |

|