 |

Tommaso Bolognesi
Bio [2005]
Tommaso Bolognesi obtained his laurea in physics from Pavia
University (Italy) in 1976, and his M.S. in computer science from the
University of Illinois in 1982. He is currently senior researcher at
ISTI-CNR, an Institute of the Italian National Research Council at
Pisa. His initial research interest was the application of stochastic
processes and fractals to computer music composition. He then moved to
formal specification and verification of concurrent systems, and
contributed to the definition of the LOTOS specification language (an
ISO standard). Later on he has worked on timed extensions of process
algebra, on the relations between graphical and algebraic
representations of process networks, on specification styles based on
constraint composition, on their application to various classes of
languages, on the unification of event-based and state-based
paradigms. He teaches software engineering at the University of Siena,
and is a member of the program committee of several conferences on
formal methods.
Project Title
Petri Net Landscapes and Beyond
Project
Petri nets are a graphical formalism for describing concurrent
systems, in which nondeterminism, independence,
sequentiality/causality, and synchronization among events are regarded as
important aspects of behaviour. Petri nets can be understood as a
generalization of interacting finite state machines, and may indeed
exhibit infinite states. Process algebras also model concurrent
systems, but offer the advantages of algebraic manipulation and
elegant formal semantics. In their basic form, Petri nets are known
not to be Turing powerful, but simple extensions are sufficient to
immediately reach full theoretical expressive power.
In the first part of my project I investigated, in NKS style, the
"versatility" of plain Petri nets (often called place/transition
nets), in search of some graphical evidence of their intermediate
position between finite-state and Turing machines. This implies
enumerating them, and devising a way to let their computations
generate two-dimensional patterns. Inspiration is drawn from the
experiments at pp. 608-609 of the NKS book, where the relation between
finite-state computations and nested behaviours is given an effective
pictorial representation. An interesting difference between these
(special) finite-state machines and Petri nets is that the latter may
not be always ready to accept an input symbol. This fact triggers
interesting questions on the final shapes of the reachable portions of
the canvas. Furthermore, various criteria may be explored for
associating a color to the final state of Petri net computation (if
any). Color ranges of unbounded size are quite plausible, in light of
the potential unbounded growth of tokens circulating in the net.
In the second part of my project, I explored this technique with
process-algebraic expressions, and conducted NKS-style experiments
meant to expose the complexity of various small sets of
process-algebraic operators. At a syntactic level, process-algebraic
expressions are similar to Mathematica expressions, and have a
tree structure. At the semantic level, they denote behavior trees
(nondeterministic computations) in which arcs are labeled by
instantaneous, atomic events. The canvas method seems less effective
for process algebras.
Favorite Four-Color, Nearest-Neighbor, Totalistic Rule

Rule chosen: 810308
I like this one because of the vertical flowing stripes, similar to
rivers that persist in preserving the separation of their waters,
perhaps of different temperatures, when sharing the same bed.
|
 |

|